Models of Addictions
Medical Model of Substance Use Disorders-
According to (Doweiko, H.E., 2012) medical model addresses assumptions that
there is a possibility of disease, and it further results in biological
upheaval. As the environment presents itself, it can trigger genetic factors in
theperson that could be inherited. E.M. Jellinek is the majority of the reason
that alcohol was accepted as a medical disease. Jellinek addressed alcohol in
four different stages. 1)Pre alcoholic stage: known as relief drinking. 2)
Prodromal stage: blackouts and guilt overdrinking. 3) self-esteem suffers and
social functions are avoided that do not cater to drinking activities. 4)
Chronic stage: destruction of morals and tremors. Doweiko (2012).
Doweiko
(2012) further states “there is no single, universally accepted disease model
of SUDs. The medical model is loosely associated with numerous theories, and
many have suggested that our fate is tied to genetics, but genetic inheritance
does not define our behavior. If this were the case there could be no
responsibility placed upon the behavior of the abuser. A person s environment
and personal experiences can determine whether genetic occurrences will kick
in. External forces can be a determining factor as well.
It
may signal relief to place the responsibility of the problem on genetics. We
are still in immature stages of being able to evaluate genetics relating to the
risks for psychiatric illnesses. According to Doweiko (2012) he further states
that it is foundational ignorance that the medical and, psychological
professionals speak out about patient’s genetic makeup towards addictions as if
there was little hope, as if they were destined to develop a disorder with the
lack of knowledge we have about biogenetics. Further critics of the
pharmaceutical industry such as (cited Breggin,Peter, 2008; Doweiko, 2012)
stated:
Healthcare providers and the general public have
been bamboozled by much advertised speculations that brain scans can demonstrate
the existence of mental disorders, or even diagnose them. In reality, no
psychiatric disorder is demonstrable or diagnosable by brain scan, or by other
medical or biological tests.
Doweiko
(2012) further addresses that healthcare persons understanding is that a
disorder exists inside an individual. This is a false illusion that is not
being represented, and it is allowing for misrepresentation that biological
factors redeem excuses for behavior that is unacceptable. Biology being an excuse by health care
professionals. This leaves no accountability or hope for change.
A
personality model of substance use is a theory that there is an addictive
personality. According to Doweiko (2012) this arose during the 20th
century in the beginning of psychoanalysis that had to do with hidden trauma
that may have caused a person to turn to alcohol or drugs. Doweiko (2012)
stated “Psychoanalytic writers hold that individuals used alcohol to numb themselves
to emotional pain”. (p. 348) it is considered to be positive reinforcement,
pleasure or euphoria, and also helps to deal with bad emotional states.
Substance
Use Disorders: The Final Common Pathway Theory. When using substances there rewards
from the drug diminish over time and the increase of the drug is needed to satisfy
dopamine levels. If the pleasure grows to boredom other compounds are sought
out to increase the euphoric feeling according to Doweiko (2012). Eventually
the drugs overwhelm the brains
reward system, and this causes it to fire
enormously after using the drug. Disease model seems to be dominate in the
United States. There are many insights as stated by Doweiko (2012), but all of
these approaches are unable to explain the complexity of SUD adequately.
While we know there are some biological factors that consist with this viewpoint, there is entirely to much medicating or allowing the person that is addicted to believe they will be this way their entire lives. If we treat based on medical models, everyone with the problem with a mental disorder and substance abuse problem will be treated with psychotropic drugs, which in fact is what is happening today. While I do agree with temporary treatment, medical professionals are not trained in the field of addiction, so this limits them to medicating. The medical model leaves out the hope of change from addiction.
In AA they address their meetings that I am Jane Do and I am an alcoholic. This however does not mean that Jane will stay in that addictive state, nor does it mean that all people with mental disorders will be inprisoned to that state of occurrence. This medical model is bandaging the problem and not cutting it at the root. There is power in redemption and also hope and change outside of the biological genetic aspect. Most in the profession of psychology have little training on dealing with substance disorders. Now that the prison systems are so full and most of them have substance abuse disorders medical models enslave them with the theories of the disease model. I think our society has suffered greatly in our culture here in the United States because of this. Also the United States is preferenced to the medical model, and over the past years it is not proving it's success.
I agree that we are in a debate of nature, nurture and spiritual examinations here, and I hope that testing will be done on other groups to determine ways to live a free life and not one that is weighed down in the prison system or meds, because it is creating one of the worst problems within our society. I am not biased to the medical or genetic problems, but the disease model has not proven to be effective on the National level. There is redemptive work that goes to the center of the root, and we do not only have to treat this problem medically, but I believe the problem for many can be cured and that is the path that is hopeful among Celebrate Recovery groups that have had high success rates dealing with addictions.
To grasp the best of these concepts and use what resources that are available. The United States is biased to the medical model and this is very discouraging, and there is a growing need for substance abuse counselors like never before. Jesus Christ was the greatest of all Cognitive teachers and it is my believe if we follow his model there can be healing of the sick and a cure for addiction. Once again I would like to express I am not ruling out the medical model, but we need to move forward with other ways that could be more helpful that will lead to lasting results.
While we know there are some biological factors that consist with this viewpoint, there is entirely to much medicating or allowing the person that is addicted to believe they will be this way their entire lives. If we treat based on medical models, everyone with the problem with a mental disorder and substance abuse problem will be treated with psychotropic drugs, which in fact is what is happening today. While I do agree with temporary treatment, medical professionals are not trained in the field of addiction, so this limits them to medicating. The medical model leaves out the hope of change from addiction.
In AA they address their meetings that I am Jane Do and I am an alcoholic. This however does not mean that Jane will stay in that addictive state, nor does it mean that all people with mental disorders will be inprisoned to that state of occurrence. This medical model is bandaging the problem and not cutting it at the root. There is power in redemption and also hope and change outside of the biological genetic aspect. Most in the profession of psychology have little training on dealing with substance disorders. Now that the prison systems are so full and most of them have substance abuse disorders medical models enslave them with the theories of the disease model. I think our society has suffered greatly in our culture here in the United States because of this. Also the United States is preferenced to the medical model, and over the past years it is not proving it's success.
I agree that we are in a debate of nature, nurture and spiritual examinations here, and I hope that testing will be done on other groups to determine ways to live a free life and not one that is weighed down in the prison system or meds, because it is creating one of the worst problems within our society. I am not biased to the medical or genetic problems, but the disease model has not proven to be effective on the National level. There is redemptive work that goes to the center of the root, and we do not only have to treat this problem medically, but I believe the problem for many can be cured and that is the path that is hopeful among Celebrate Recovery groups that have had high success rates dealing with addictions.
To grasp the best of these concepts and use what resources that are available. The United States is biased to the medical model and this is very discouraging, and there is a growing need for substance abuse counselors like never before. Jesus Christ was the greatest of all Cognitive teachers and it is my believe if we follow his model there can be healing of the sick and a cure for addiction. Once again I would like to express I am not ruling out the medical model, but we need to move forward with other ways that could be more helpful that will lead to lasting results.
Addictions
result from the degrading effects of sin on or in creation. This includes the
self and the sin of others and the world. The body is in need of redemption. We
are not in a glorified state yet, and that leaves us in a vulnerable state to
all kinds of things. Full healing can only be found in Jesus Christ and his
redemptive work. (Clinton, T. 2005)
References
Clinton, T. (2005) Caring for people God's
way; A New Guide for Christian Counseling
Doweiko, H.E. (2012) Concepts of Chemical Dependency (8th
Ed.)
No comments:
Post a Comment